Alastair Hay BSc (Hons) LCH RSHom | M: 07940 525495 | E: al@homeopathical.com
HomeopathicAl
  • About
  • Consultations
  • Workshops
  • News

the myth-selling of herd immunity

23/10/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
This blog has been inspired by a recent Facebook post I read from a well-educated member of NHS staff citing 'herd immunity' and those now shunning the MMR vaccine as the reason she may now be susceptible if exposed to rubella virus that could affect her unborn child’s development.

‘Herd immunity’ is the protective effect that occurs when a population contracts and recovers naturally from an infection.




The phrase ‘herd immunity’ was originally coined in 1933 by epidemiological research from A W Hedrich (1). He studied measles patterns in the US between 1900 and 1931, before the introduction of a measles vaccine. His observation was that measles epidemics only occurred when >68% of children had developed natural immunity to it. This is based on the principle that people build their own immunity after suffering with, or being exposed to the disease. Therefore, if at least 68% of the population were allowed to build their own natural defence, there would be no epidemic, there would literally be ‘herd immunity’.

However, ‘herd immunity’ is a term that has been applied to vaccine-induced immunity without scientific basis.

Have you read that vaccination uptake needs to be 95% for it to be effective and protect the rest of the ‘herd’? Where does this information come from? I can’t find any scientific data that justifies or explains the extrapolation of 68% of a population being naturally immune to 95% of a population being vaccinated to produce ‘herd immunity’ within that population. It appears that Henrich’s data has been manipulated to suit a vaccination agenda.

When vaccines were first introduced, their proponents asserted that they provided a ‘life-long’ immunity in the same way as natural immunity. This was shown not to be the case, hence the introduction of ‘booster shots’ at intervals between 2 and 10 years. Furthermore, outbreaks still occur in groups where vaccination uptake is 100% even having had booster shots. (2, 3)

Herd immunity is based on an active disease and not based on mimicking the disease with a vaccination. A vaccine isn't nature, it's manufactured to challenge the immune system to produce antibodies to a pathogen. We cannot apply the same model of herd immunity in a natural disease to vaccination policy, yet we do... falsely.

and finally...

Whether I’m immune or not, does not determine whether I carry a virus (or a bacteria for that matter), so it’s nonsensical to deduce that a child vaccinated with pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine for instance, somehow stops carrying pertussis bacteria in their lungs simply because they have been vaccinated. Furthermore, it won’t prevent the vaccinated children from spreading the bacteria either. The vaccine is, however, designed to modulate the vaccinated individual’s response to the exposure of the bacteria. Vaccination rates for whooping cough have no impact on whether pertussis bacteria is in the air, or whether they breathe them in. Should you choose to vaccinate, there is no need to worry about unvaccinated individuals - a non-vaccinated child is no better at transmitting pertussis than a vaccinated one.

We have been led to believe that vaccination will stop you carrying a virus or bacteria... it won’t.

However, it's likely to modify your reaction to the bacteria or virus.

My Summary:


  • Unvaccinated individuals are no more disease vectors than vaccinated individuals.
  • Do not choose, or be coerced into vaccinating solely on the basis of herd immunity. 
References:

  1. Monthly estimates of the child population “susceptible” to measles, 1900–1931, Baltimore,Maryland. Am J Hyg 1933;17:613-636.
  2. Measles outbreak in a fully immunized secondary-school population.
  3. Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination - Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in Immunized Persons.

Further reading:

           Evolution of Measles Elimination Strategies in the United States.

0 Comments
    News and Blog, directly from Al to you.
    WARNING: I CAN BE CONTROVERSIAL ON HERE

    RSS Feed

    The most current news articles I uncover can be found on my Twitter page

    Tweets by @homeopathical

    Archives

    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    March 2018
    July 2015
    June 2014
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013

    Categories

    All
    Agenda
    Alastair Hay
    Allergy
    Antibiotics
    Antihistamines
    Bachelor Of Science Homeopathy
    Ban Homeopathy
    Chinese Water-snake
    Con
    Deluded
    Deluded Fool
    Evidence
    GP
    Grass Pollen
    Hay Fever
    Herd Immunity
    Homeopathical
    Homeopathic Medicine
    Homeopathy
    Homeopathy Bsc
    Homeopathy Is Dangerous
    Homeopathy Is Placebo
    Homeopathy Is Witchcraft
    Immunity
    Measles
    Medicine
    Mmr
    Mumps
    Natural Immunity
    NHS
    NHS Homeopathy
    Pharmacodoxy
    Pharmacology
    Piriton
    Placebo
    Placebo Effect
    Pollen
    Pollen Calender
    Proving
    Pseudosceptic
    Pseudoskeptic
    Pseudo Skeptic
    Rct
    Rcts
    Rhinitis
    Rubella
    Scarlet Fever
    Sceptic
    Scepticism
    Sceptics Agenda
    Science
    Scientific
    Sham
    Skeptic
    Skepticism
    Skeptics Agenda
    Smallpox
    Snake Oil
    Snake-oil
    Snake Oil Salespeople
    Snake Oil Sales People
    Tonsillitis
    Vaccination
    Vaccine Immunity
    Whooping Cough
    Witchcraft


    www.homeopathical.com copyright © Alastair Hay
    BSc (Hons) LCH RSHom Homoeopath

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.