Alastair Hay BSc (Hons) LCH RSHom | M: 07940 525495 | E: al@homeopathical.com
HomeopathicAl
  • About
  • Consultations
  • Workshops
  • News

the skeptics agenda - part 6 - conclusions and solutions

11/10/2013

5 Comments

 
Picture

The skeptics agenda, first and foremost is to have homeopathy banned. The basis of which is not sound evidence, but an aversion to ‘homeopathy’, a prejudice, by definition.

The etymology of skepticism implies enquiring and reflection, not dismissiveness. A true skeptic doesn't make pre-judgements. This actually makes them ‘pseudo’ skeptics. We all have prejudices, we are all biased. Our beliefs taint the way we judge and validate new ideas. The thing is, as is aptly explained in this blog, we don’t want to be wrong and we will strongly defend those beliefs.

The impression a skeptic, or indeed pseudoskeptic gives, is that they are right and you are wrong. They are wise and learned and you are not. They are the group that should decide whether you have access to homeopathy and not you. The ultimate result is a denial of your choice. If homeopathy was as insignificant as it’s made out to be, do you think they’d be gunning for it? The problem is, it’s viable ‘competition’.

For some, it’s really important to know ‘how’ something works, and for others it’s more important to see it work. My job, as a homeopathic practitioner, or ‘homeopath’ is actually to make homeopathy work, rather than to find out how it works. For example, the mechanism of action of the painkiller, paracetamol is still poorly understood, yet we know and accept that it works. However, you can analyse a paracetamol tablet and find ‘active’ chemical constituents in it. How about electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) though? No tablets, no chemistry, poorly understood, and still used in some circumstances to manage mental illness, with effect, yet we have little understanding how it works. I’m sure that if this fell under the banner of ‘homeopathy’, the skeptics' opinion of it would differ.

Summary of The Skeptics Agenda


Part 1 - Skeptics claim homeopathy is unscientific

Some elements of homeopathy are scientific, Samuel Hahnemann, the founder of homeopathy was a scientist. Some elements of homeopathy are ‘artistic’. Medicine is not based purely on science. Many practices in medicine are based on inference, theory, the fact that it’s always been done that way and the knowledge of observable favourable reaction without fully understanding the mechanism of action.

Medicine ≠ science.

Solution – Do patients / clients derive benefit from it? Focus on the results.

Part 2 - Skeptics claim homeopathy is dangerous

Homeopathy isn’t dangerous but homeopaths can be. The lack of integration and animosity between medical disciplines and pride is a stumbling block.

Solution – Train homeopaths well, and regulate appropriately.


Part 3 - Skeptics claim homeopathy is merely placebo

The placebo ‘effect’, is still an effect. Understanding placebo is science. Conventional and non-conventional medical methodologies utilise placebo. There is no significant difference between the beneficial interventions of conventional medical treatments compared to the positive evidence for homeopathy. Animals respond to homeopathic medicines.

Solution – Focus on the word ‘effect’ and not ‘placebo’.

Part 4 - Skeptics claim homeopaths are bare-faced lying snake-oil sales people

Within the realms of homeopathic practice, we don’t have sales reps promoting their medicines to homeopaths. Homeopaths are not ‘incentivised’ to prescribe particular homeopathic medicines over another homeopathic medicine and when a new homeopathic medicine is formulated, it costs the same as one that’s been available for 200 years. Furthermore, the information about new discoveries in homeopathy is shared amongst homeopathic pharmacies freely.

Solution – Understand how homeopaths make a living and how the pharmaceutical industry and medical profession works.


Part 5 - Skeptics claim homeopathy is witchcraft

'Homeopathy is witchcraft' is a statement based on observing that homeopathy works but having no idea how.

Solution – Accept homeopathy works and that we have a limited understanding of how.



Conclusion

Be a skeptic, but be a real skeptic, not a pseudo-skeptic. Base your understanding of the world on what you actually see, feel, hear, smell, touch and taste for real; not what you read in the news or what someone tells you, but what you experience. Question everything. Never accept anything as unquestionable since that is where dogma starts, and progress stops.

Who actually benefits if homeopathy is banned? It's unlikely to be you.

Next week...

Al's Agenda
5 Comments
james
11/10/2013 06:47:24 am

"Skeptics claim homeopathy is witchcraft. 'Homeopathy is witchcraft' is a statement based on observing that homeopathy works but having no idea how."

Which skeptics believe witchcraft works?

Reply
Slipp Digby
11/10/2013 10:25:09 am

I'm struggling to reconcile your conclusion

"Question everything. Never accept anything as unquestionable since that is where dogma starts, and progress stops"

with Point 5

"Accept homeopathy works and that we have a limited understanding of how"

They appear rather contradictory, perhaps you would be kind enough to clarify?

Reply
Al link
11/10/2013 10:51:40 am

Good point...
The statement "Accept homeopathy works and that we have a limited understanding of how" is with reference to "Skeptics claim homeopathy is witchcraft". However, I would not suggest accepting something without experiencing it. Hopefully, this clarifies. Thank you for your enquiry.

Reply
Derek Colanduno link
11/10/2013 02:13:43 pm

I don't know many skeptics who call it 'witchcraft', more like complete malarky, or snake oil. Those would be completely appropriate terms.

'Homeopathy' can NOT work any further than placebo. That is an undeniable fact. With simple mathematics alone you can learn that fact. Just look up Avogadro's number, and do some calculations.

So, lets say that, somehow, you got even one molecule of the supposed 'treatment' in the dose. Well, then... you would have to figure out how the entirely bogus idea of how the treatments are *supposed* to work.

Because, that second part is basically, a bit strange as well.

Reply
NCERT Solutions for Class 8 Maths link
10/2/2021 07:28:45 pm

Thank you for the conclusion and solution

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    News and Blog, directly from Al to you.
    WARNING: I CAN BE CONTROVERSIAL ON HERE

    RSS Feed

    The most current news articles I uncover can be found on my Twitter page

    Tweets by @homeopathical

    Archives

    April 2021
    October 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    March 2018
    July 2015
    June 2014
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013

    Categories

    All
    Agenda
    Alastair Hay
    Allergy
    Antibiotics
    Antihistamines
    Bachelor Of Science Homeopathy
    Ban Homeopathy
    Chinese Water-snake
    Con
    Deluded
    Deluded Fool
    Evidence
    GP
    Grass Pollen
    Hay Fever
    Homeopathical
    Homeopathic Medicine
    Homeopathy
    Homeopathy Bsc
    Homeopathy Is Dangerous
    Homeopathy Is Placebo
    Homeopathy Is Witchcraft
    Immunity
    Medicine
    NHS
    NHS Homeopathy
    Pharmacology
    Piriton
    Placebo
    Placebo Effect
    Pollen
    Pollen Calender
    Proving
    Pseudosceptic
    Pseudoskeptic
    Pseudo Skeptic
    Rct
    Rcts
    Rhinitis
    Sceptic
    Scepticism
    Sceptics Agenda
    Science
    Scientific
    Sham
    Skeptic
    Skepticism
    Skeptics Agenda
    Snake Oil
    Snake-oil
    Snake Oil Salespeople
    Snake Oil Sales People
    Tonsillitis
    Witchcraft


    www.homeopathical.com copyright © Alastair Hay
    BSc (Hons) LCH RSHom Homoeopath

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.